close this bookBiodiversity and Conservation
source ref: biobook.html
View the documentMetadata
View the documentChapter 1:Introduction, History of Life
View the documentChapter 2:The Age of Mammals
View the documentChapter 3: Extinction And deplition From Over-Exploitation
View the documentChapter 4:Whaling And Fishing
View the documentChapter 5:Overexploitation Threatening Living Species
View the documentChapter 6:Global Patterns of Biodiversity
View the documentChapter 7:Values of Biodiversity
View the documentChapter 8:Endangered Species Conservation
View the documentChapter 9:Exotic Introductions
View the documentChapter 10:Forests and Deforestation
View the documentChapter 11:Endangered Aquatic Habitats
View the documentChapter 12:Islands
View the documentChapter 13:Protected Areas
View the documentChapter 14:Habitat Pollution
View the documentChapter 15:Captive Breeding and Reintroduction
View the documentChapter 16:Human Population

Chapter 6:Global Patterns of Biodiversity

Chapter 6: GLOBAL PATTERNS OF BIODIVERSITY

The Antarctic gravelbeard plunderfish (Artedidraco glareobarbatus), a new species discovered at a depth of 130 m near Franklin Island in the Ross Sea. 
© Danatte Pratt, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine (published in Antarctic Science, 1999, Vol. 11, No. 1).
MEASURING BIODIVERSITY
    Cataloging and Discovering Species
    Number of Species on Earth
    Geographical Patterns of Species Richness
    Biogeography
    Importance of Distribution Patterns
         Local Endemics
         Sparsely Distributed Species
         Migratory Species
         Conservation Hot Spots

BIODIVERSITY IN THE UNITED STATES

BIODIVERSITY IN CALIFORNIA

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
    The Biological Resources Division, USGS

GAP Analysis

MEASURING BIODIVERSITY

In order to monitor and conserve biological diversity, it is important to have ways of measuring it and documenting the levels of diversity in different parts of the world. We have to consider diversity at different levels. There is diversity between:

Subspecies are anatomically distinct from one another, but still able to interbreed under natural conditions. The White Rhino is an example we have already mentioned - it has northern and southern subspecies, each with their own conservation problems.

The anatomical differences between subspecies indicate that they are distinct genetic entities. They might often represent early stages in the creation of new species. For these reasons they are eligible for listing and protection under the Endangered Species Act, in the same way that species are protected.

The most useful level is the species, because most scientists agree on what constitutes a species. A commonly accepted definition is "a population whose members are able to interbreed freely under natural conditions". The phrase "under natural conditions" is important, because closely related species can often hybridize with one another under unnatural conditions (e.g. captivity). Even tigers and lions can interbreed in captivity, but there is no record of it having happened in nature (partly because they live in different habitats). An interesting example is the red wolf which some authorities consider a separate species, some a subspecies of gray wolf, and some a hybrid between the coyote and the gray wolf.

Notice that this definition says nothing about the commonly used criterion that species are usually anatomically different, or different in appearance, from each other. Anatomical differences are, in fact, usually the main basis for identifying and naming new species. Read about speciation - the process by which new species are formed.

Cataloging and Discovering Species

Cataloging the biodiversity on Earth is a huge team effort.  The The Tree of Life the All-species Foundation and the All-species Inventory are efforts to use the World Wide Web to coordinate the efforts of hundreds of biologists to classify and describe species. 

The ultimate measure of biodiversity is the total number of species in existence. Surprisingly, biologists do not agree on this number, even to the nearest order of magnitude. There are about 1.8 million described and named species of organisms. Over half of described species are insects from temperate zones, but the real number of species of insects is very uncertain.

New Major Groups.  Occasionally radically new forms are found:

For many years biologists divided life forms into:

  • The prokaryotes, in which the DNA is not enclosed in a nucleus.  This groups includes the bacteria and viruses.
  • The eukaryotes, in which the DNA is enclosed in a nucleus.  This group includes the algae, fungi, protozoans, animals, and plants. 

A third major group of organisms, called Archaea, consisting of about 500 species, was discovered in 1977. They went undiscovered for so long because they look very much like bacteria, and they are very difficult to culture in the lab.  They were first discovered in the most extreme environments on Earth - the hottest, coldest, and highest pressure environments, in high salt and alkaline environments, etc., so they are sometimes called "extremophiles". But now scientists are finding that they are very abundant in the open ocean as well, especially around Antarctica.  In fact, they are so abundant that they are estimated to make up about 30% of the biomass on Earth.

A novel type of animal (less than 1mm long) was found living on the mouth parts of lobsters (Funch and Kristensen, 1995). It is totally unlike any known type of animal, both in its anatomy and its very complex life cycle. It defines a new phylum (Cycliophora) of animals. Examples of the other 35 phyla of animals are annelids (worms), arthropods (insects, spiders, crustaceans), echinoderms (sea urchins and starfish), mollusks (snails, clams), and chordates (including all the vertebrates).

New Species.  About 10,000 new species are found every year, and most of these are insects and other inconspicuous animals. Usually new species are related to known ones and therefore fit into already-known groups of species such as families. Even in well-known groups such as birds and mammals, new species are still being discovered, at the rate of about 1-5 birds and 1-5 mammals per year (mainly in the tropics). Some recent examples are: 

  • The black-faced lion tamarin of Brazil; a few dozen of these animals were found in 1990 living within 200 miles of Rio de Janeiro.
  • The Satere marmoset - a squirrel-size marmoset from the Amazon rain forest, the sixth new monkey species to be discovered in Brazil since 1990.
  • The Peruvian beaked whale - the first new species of whale to be discovered in 28 years - was discovered in 1976 in the south Pacific. It is the smallest beaked whale, only about the size of a small dolphin. Like other beaked whales, it has only two functional teeth, in the lower jaw.
  • The pseudoryx (saola) - A new species of cow discovered in 1992 in the Vu Quang forest of Vietnam. It looks like a 3-foot tall goat although it is more closely related to cattle. It was first identified from bones and hides from 20 specimens. Then in 1994 two young live specimens were caught and sent to a zoo in Hanoi. Unfortunately they died soon after arrival. The first adult was captured and brought to a zoo in Laos in January 1996, and died 16 days after capture, apparently from starvation. Various expeditions have tried without success to find the animal in the wild. Vietnam is one of Asia's biologically richest countries, and the Vu Quang forest has also revealed several new species of fish.  
  • A new species of miniature deer from Myanmar (Burma) was recently confirmed by DNA testing.
  • Megamouth shark: Only 11 specimens of this huge (5m-long) filter-feeding shark have been found. The only living one was brought into Dana Point harbor several years ago. You can see a preserved specimen at the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History.
  • Cryptic warbler. Not only a new species, but also a new genus of songbird discovered in the rain forest of Madagascar in 1992.
  • Four new species of fish were recently discovered in Antarctica. This extremely cold environment hosts an amazing diversity of fish species.  One group, called notothenioids, now dominates all habitats in the Antarctic ocean.  Fish inhabiting the water column elsewhere on earth gain their buoyancy from an air-filled swim bladder, but the notothenioids are all derived from bottom-dwellers without swim bladders, and solve the buoyancy problem differently - by an increase in body fat.  Four new species of notothenioids were discovered on recent research cruises.
  • New videos taken by remote-controlled submersibles show some amazing and huge squid that are different from all known families.

  • The coelacanth.  This very primitive fish with fleshy fins was known only from 80-million year old fossils until in 1938 one showed up in a fish market on an island near Madagascar.  History repeated itself in 1998 when another one was found, again in a fish market but this time in Indonesia suggesting the existence of another population in the deep sea, thousands of miles from the first one.  Apparently these fish live in caves on the sides of underwater volcanoes.  Read Samantha Weinberg's fascinating account of the discovery! (click on the book)

Sometimes species thought to be extinct are rediscovered - for example the three-inch long, nocturnal, hairy-eared dwarf lemur rediscovered in 1989 in Madagascar after being missing since 1964.

New Ecosystems

Even entirely new ecosystems are still being discovered.  In the last few decades new groups of organisms have been found living in the following environments:

  • Hydro-thermal marine vents.  These were discovered by scientists aboard the submersible Alvin in the mid-1970's along ridges on the ocean bottom a mile and a half beneath the surface, where the plates of the earth's crust are spreading apart. The vents, which are like submarine hot springs, have been found to support over 300 new species of organisms. They included giant tube worms up to three feet long, huge clams over a foot long, as well as shrimps, crabs and fishes. This was a complete surprise, because of the absence of any known primary energy source to support life. The tube worms were especially interesting because they had no mouth, gut or anus!  Soon it was discovered that not only were there new species living in these areas, but many of them also had a new kind of physiology, in which the primary source of energy is hydrogen sulfide coming from the vent. The hydrogen sulfide is oxidized by special symbiotic bacteria living in the tissues of the animal. The bacteria use the energy to convert carbon dioxide into substances that can be used for growth by the animal. These symbiotic bacteria were found in tube worms, clams and mussels.
  • Anchialine caves. These habitats are flooded caves, under land but usually near the coast, that have no direct surface connection with the sea. They are inhabited by a group of strange survivors from ancient lineages.  About 200 new species, including an entirely new class of crustaceans have been described from these caves.
  • Lava tubes.  Another new ecosystem was discovered in the 1960's in lava tubes - caves underneath lava flows in Hawaii. These caves contained many new species of animals that were adapted to life in darkness. The primary food source for this ecosystem is the roots of ohia trees which hang down into the caves. Small sap-sucking bugs called root hoppers (related to leaf hoppers on the surface) are the next step in the food chain in these lava tubes. Predators include cave-adapted relatives of big-eyed spiders, including small-eyed big-eyed spiders and no-eyed big-eyed spiders!

Number of Species on Earth

Until a few years ago, the total number of species on earth was estimated at between 1.4 and 6 million. These estimates were obtained as follows:

For the more conspicuous birds and mammals, the number of species is known quite accurately, both for tropical species as well as temperate ones. It is estimated that at least 98% of birds have been discovered. For birds there are 2-3 times as many tropical species as temperate ones. For other organisms most of the named species (1.4 million) are from temperate countries. If we assume that the same factor applies to other organisms as to birds, then there are 2-3 times this many tropical species (2.8-4.2 million, giving an estimated total species of 4.2-5.6 million.

A dramatic upward revision of these estimates to 30 million came about as a result of work by Erwin on tropical beetles. Erwin used an insecticidal fog, generated by a machine hoisted high in the tree canopy, to knock down the canopy insects. Because they are so inaccessible, there had been few systematic studies of tropical canopy insects. Erwin collected the arthropods from 19 trees of a certain species (Luehea seemannii) in Panama over three seasons. The sample included 1,100 species of beetles!

To use this information to estimate the total species number, we need to know what fraction of these are host-specific (i.e. found only on this species of tree). The estimates (really guesses) are in the table. From this, Erwin estimated that 160 beetle species are host tree-specific.

Beetles represent about 40% of all known arthropod species; therefore Erwin estimated 160 x 100/40 = 400 arthropod species per tree species. Next, he estimated that the canopy is roughly twice as species-rich as the forest floor, and is composed mainly of different species. Therefore, including the forest floor brings the total to 600 arthropod species per tree species.

The estimated total number of species of tropical trees is 50,000. Therefore, the total number of tropical arthropod species is estimated as 600 x 50,000 = 30 million.

Each step of Erwin's argument is questionable. For example:

  1. If the fraction specific to the tree were only half that estimated, then the total estimate would be reduced by half. The species on the forest floor might not be host-tree specific.
  2. The arthropods in the canopy may be more or less than 40% beetles.
  3. The type of tree examined may not be typical.

A more reliable estimate comes from work on tropical bugs (hemipterans) on the island of Sulawesi, Indonesia by Hodkinson and Casson (1991). They sampled bugs over a one-year period using several sampling methods at several sites including a variety of host plants. They found that the rate of accumulation of previously unrecorded species "slowed to a trickle" at the end of the study period, indicating that they had identified a substantial fraction of the species in that area. They found a total of 1690 species of which only 37.5% were previously described. Total of described species of hemipterans is 78,656. Therefore, a simple estimate for the real total is 78,656 x 100/37.5 = 209,749 (Hodkinson and Casson's calculation is a little more complex and difficult to understand). Hemipterans represent about 10% of all described insect species; therefore, the estimate for the total number of insect species is about 2.1 million, giving an estimate for the total species number of about 5 million - consistent with earlier estimates.

Geographical Patterns of Species Richness

The best way to preserve biodiversity is, of course, by protecting the habitats of as many species as possible. Since we cannot protect everything, how do we decide which areas should receive the highest priority?

One way of assigning priorities would be to select the regions with the greatest number of species. For most well-studied groups of organisms, species richness increases from the poles to the equator.

The same geographical pattern is seen in the marine environment. For example, on Australia's Great Barrier Reef, the number of genera of coral is less than 10 at the southern end but more than 50 at the northern end. The number of sea squirt species is 103 in the arctic but 629 in the tropics. Even deep sea species diversity is higher in the tropics than at the poles.

The reason for the species richness of the tropics is not known, but the following ideas have been proposed:

  1. Organisms in the tropics have had a longer time in which to evolve new species. In temperate zones species have been periodically wiped out by glaciation during the ice ages.
  2. Milder climate and greater supply of solar energy allows more biomass to be produced. This translates into more organisms per unit area, so more species can exist in a given area.

There are, of course, local patterns superimposed on this global tendency, with some areas being especially rich in certain groups of species. The Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea and the Solomon Islands are rich in many different types of organisms including corals.

In other places the wildlife is very abundant although the number of species may not break any records.  An example is the Southern Ocean surrounding the Antarctic continent, which supports one of the most productive ecosystems on Earth. The Antarctic Circumpolar Current brings nutrient-rich water to the surface, supporting abundant growth of phytoplankton.  The phytoplankton provides food for shrimp-like krill, and the krill provides food for huge populations of fish, birds, seals and whales.

Biogeography

The science of biogeography is the study of the geographic distribution of organisms.  It was started by Alfred Russell Wallace, the co-originator with Charles Darwin of the theory of evolution.  One of its principles is that the earth can be divided into six or eight biogeographic realms -  the Nearctic, Palearctic, Ethiopian, Australian, Oriental, and Neotropical, in which the organisms present tend to be quite distinct from those of other realms. For example, the Australian realm is distinctive because of the large number of marsupials that have evolved during its long isolation. It has seven endemic families of mammals, as well as four of birds and 12 of flowering plants. Other systems have been drawn up for the marine environment.

Each biogeographic realm is subdivided into provinces, which reflect different types of environment within the realm. There are 227 provinces altogether.

Much more detailed classifications are possible, and in fact essential for conservation purposes. The World Wildlife fund and National Geographic Society recently mapped 867 terrestrial ecoregions of the world. Each is distinguished by its ecological features, climate, and animal and plant communities.

An example of fine-scale ecological diversity is provided by a small local canyon called Buck Gully, which contains nine different habitat types defined by their plant communities: chaparral, grassland, riparian, Venturan-Diegan coastal sage scrub, California buckwheat scrub, sagebrush scrub, mixed sage scrub, southern cactus scrub, and sagebrush-grassland scrub, each containing different collections of species and each worth preserving. The Nature Conservancy has identified over 3000 plant communities. A good target would be to preserve enough of each type of community to ensure its survival and that of all the species that live in it or depend on it (for example, migratory species).

Importance of Distribution Patterns

Obviously rare organisms are more prone to extinction than common ones. However, the pattern of distribution is also important.

Local Endemics

At one extreme are species which are restricted to one very small area, although they may be very abundant at that location (local endemics). The silversword plant grows only in the crater of Haleakala on Maui but there are some 47,000 individuals at that site. The Devil's Hole pupfish is restricted to a single desert spring in Nevada.

Locally endemic species tend to occur where the geography provides isolated patches such as mountains, islands, peninsulas, certain soil types or patches of forests surrounded by lava flows. Remote oceanic islands such as Hawaii and Ascension have the world's most distinctive floras. 91% of the 956 plants native to the Hawaiian Islands are endemic to those islands. The Hawaiian Islands are the most remote islands on earth, being at least 2,000 miles from the nearest major land mass in any direction. 80% of the 8,000 vascular plant species of Madagascar are endemic. 90% of the 9,000 flowering plants of Papua New Guinea and 76% of New Caledonia's 3,250 vascular plants are endemic. By contrast, regions that are not geographically isolated have lower proportions of endemic species - for example, only 1% of West Germany's species are endemic.

Locally endemic species can be saved by protecting a small area, but they are very susceptible to extinction due to over-exploitation and habitat loss. This is why many of the well-known extinctions are of species endemic to islands - notably the Dodo, the best-known example of extinction, which was endemic to the island of Mauritius.  About half of the known animal extinctions in the last 400 years, and at least 90 percent of the bird extinctions, were of island dwellers (see Chapter 12).

Marine organisms tend to be much more widely distributed than terrestrial species because they encounter fewer physical barriers. Many marine species, including snails, crabs, sharks and fish, are found throughout the tropics. Most species found on Australia's Great Barrier Reef are also found in other parts of the Indo-West Pacific.

There are, however, certain oceanic regions that have a high proportion of locally endemic species. The Mediterranean Sea has a fairly narrow connection to the Atlantic Ocean and this isolation has allowed the evolution of numerous endemic species in the Mediterranean. Consequently 14% of the 362 species in the Mediterranean are found nowhere else. Similarly, the Red Sea has 15% endemic fish species, and the Gulf of California has 17%. Fish that are restricted to shallow waters can also show a high frequency of endemism around isolated oceanic islands. For example 30 to 40% of the fish species at Easter Island are locally endemic.

Sparsely Distributed Species

At the opposite extreme to local endemics are sparsely distributed species, which occur over very large geographical regions but are not very abundant anywhere. Top predators - animal species near the end of the food chain such as large cats, wolves, bears, sharks and eagles - tend to be relatively scarce but widely distributed. Saving these species in the wild is very difficult and expensive, even a small population requiring protection of a large area or of smaller areas connected by wildlife corridors. For example, the tiger's home range is 8-24 square miles. Top predators have also been targets for hunters and have been unpopular with farmers because they sometimes attack livestock or even people. The Grizzly Bear (subspecies of Brown Bear) is the symbol of California but was hunted to extinction in this state.

Migratory Species

Migratory species present challenging problems because they often require habitats along and at each end of their migration routes. Many songbirds in North America are threatened by habitat loss in Central and South America as modernization of coffee plantations leaves less natural habitat than older methods, and as North American forests become fragmented.

Recent research shows that sea turtles migrate along well-defined corridors in the ocean. It might be necessary to provide protection of these migration routes as well as the nesting beaches in order to effectively conserve these species. Many of the world's most important feeding and nesting sites are along the coast of West Africa, and six species that depend on those sites are declining rapidly due to poaching for meat, eggs and shell.

The Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) was established to address the special political problems associated with conserving migratory species, many of which are in steep decline.   The Convention uses a similar listing system to other conventions, in which the most endangered species are on "Appendix I" and species for which the threat is less imminent are on "Appendix II".  At the September 2002 meeting some of the notable new listings on Appendix I were the Bactrian Camel (down to less than 1000 individuals), the Great White Shark and three species of whale.

Conservation "Hot spots"

The high levels of endemism in certain areas of the world, coupled with imminent threats from habitat loss in many of these areas, has led to the designation, by World Conservation Union (IUCN) and Conservation International, of "hot spots" for preservation. Coastal California is one of these regions. Other regions are the Atlantic coast of Brazil, Madagascar, and the Indo-west Pacific. 

BIODIVERSITY IN THE UNITED STATES

U.S. biodiversity in jeopardy, study shows

BIODIVERSITY IN CALIFORNIA

Two important facts about California:

  • California is the most biologically diverse state in the union, with 40,000 species and more federally listed species than any other mainland state.
  • California's population is expected to grow from 32 million to 49 million by the year 2025.

The high biological significance of Southern California was also highlighted in a recent study of the geographic distribution of endangered species in the U.S. (Dobson et al., Science 275; 550). The maps show the number of listed species in each county for several groups of organisms. For plants especially, Southern California turns out to be a "hot spot" of threatened biodiversity. The other hot spots are Hawaii, the southeastern coastal states, and southern Appalachia. As expected, in most cases, hot spots occur where the ranges of many endemic species overlap with intensive urbanization and agriculture.

The predicted population growth means there will inevitably be increasing pressure on our natural resources in the coming decades.  California has an urgent need to establish programs for cataloguing and preserving biodiversity.  Fortunately the state is taking this task fairly seriously.  In fact, a recent survey by the organization Defenders of Wildlife concluded that California has the nation's best biodiversity policies and programs. This was mainly in response to the development of Natural Communities Conservation Planning (see later lecture) and partly to the establishment of the the California Biodiversity Council, whose role is to "develop guiding principles and policies, design a statewide strategy to conserve biological diversity, and coordinate implementation of this strategy through regional and local institutions".

The California Resources Agency is responsible for the conservation, enhancement, and management of California's natural and cultural resources, including land, water, wildlife, parks, minerals, and historic sites. One of their programs is the California Environmental Resources Evaluation System (CERES), an information system designed to "facilitate access to a variety of electronic data describing California's rich and diverse environments".

In California, the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has the responsibility for identifying the most significant natural areas in the State.

Significant Natural Areas are those sites which meet at least one of the following criteria.

1.Areas supporting extremely rare species or natural communities;
2.Areas supporting associations or concentrations of rare species or communities;
3.Areas exhibiting representative examples of common or rare communities;
4.Areas of high species-richness or habitat-richness.

The DFG has also produced an on-line map of habitat types in California.  They also have an active program of documenting California's wildlife and endangered species.  Visit their California Wildlife Habitat Relationships page.  

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was signed by over 150 governments at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, and became effective as international law in December 1993. It is the first international agreement committing governments to comprehensive protection of the Earth's biological resources.  As of April, 2001, 180 countries and the European Union had ratified the agreement, but the United States has not done so, mainly due to the efforts of a group of senators who felt that the treaty required giving "half of America back to the wolves to save the earth".

The CBD has three overall goals:

  1. the conservation of biological diversity,
  2. the sustainable use of its components, and
  3. the fair and equitable distribution of benefits derived from "genetic resources".

By signing the CBD, participating governments agree to carry out various measures to conserve biodiversity. The measures include (among other things):

  1. to create national plans for protection of biodiversity.
  2. to identify ecosystems, species and genomes important for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity
  3. to monitor biological diversity and any factors that might have impacts on it.
  4. to establish a system of protected areas
  5. to manage biological resources to ensure conservation and sustainable use
  6. to rehabilitate and restore ecosystems
  7. to take measures for ex situ conservation.

The CBD has also published a useful Global Biodiversity Outlook.  

The CBD also includes agreements for using biological diversity. And governments must provide for "fair sharing" of the benefits derived from genetic resources (i.e. compensation for its use or transfer of technology derived from genetic resources).

The Biological Resources Division, USGS

The requirements of the CBD are being met in this country by the Biological Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey (formerly the National Biological Service), established in 1993. Its operating mission is "to work with others to provide the scientific understanding and technologies needed to support the sound management and conservation of the nation's biological resources." It sponsors a variety of national scientific research programs as well as a national information infrastructure program.  It has the following Strategic Science Plan:  

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES DIVISION STRATEGIC SCIENCE PLAN September 3, 1996

  1. Characterize natural processes and identify factors that influence the quality or quantity of the Nation's biological resources at all levels of biological organization.
  2. Facilitate sound management of the Nation's biological resources by collaborating with partners in all phases of our work.
  3. Provide national and international leadership for the development of a biological information infrastructure to provide access to, disseminate, share, and use biological data, information, and technology.
  4. Assess and report the condition of the Nation's biological resources.
  5. Integrate biological resources research, inventory, and monitoring efforts with those directed at other natural resources, throughout the USGS.

A National Biological Survey for the United States? from the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, provides an interesting perspective on how science should contribute to conservation rather than just collect information.

GAP Analysis

The U.S. Geological Service has developed a method for digitized mapping of many parameters important for conservation, including the distribution of plant communities and of vertebrate animals, and the geographic pattern of land use.  This method is called GAP analysis, because it was designed to identify gaps in the system of protected land areas, where insufficient protection was being provided for endangered and other species.  It certainly can perform this function (see example in slide show).  However, the technology can also be used for many other purposes where geographic comparisons are important, such as monitoring changes in species distribution caused by climate change; for mapping levels of contaminants so they can be compared with changes in species distribution; for tracking the spread of exotic species and of urbanization and their consequences for species distribution, and so on.

Seas Yield a Bounty of Species by David Malakoff

to previous section to next section